AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
Topaz denoise not showing in lightroom11/10/2023 Then I have to actively load my new tifs into Lightroom. If I run through Topaz directly, at the end I have both the original tif files (which I no longer want) and the modified tif files. One benefit of the Topaz plug-in from Lightroom is that tif files are first created and then overwritten to the same filename after Topaz processing, so there is no need for me to actively find and delete the original tif. It appears to add a few other cumbersome steps. I am able to take un-Topaz-processed tif files and load them directly into Topaz Denoise and work from there, but I have not figured out a good workflow with that technique. If no one has any solutions, please share workflow suggestions as workarounds. I have corresponded with Topaz support, and they insist that it is a bug in Lightroom. I do not believe it to be a memory issue, since I've watched the Windows Task Manager during the batch processing, and it doesn't get above 60% memory. Not sure if there is a log file somewhere with more information. There are no overt messages of any kind from either Lightroom Classic or Topaz Denoise, only my knowledge that there should be more files in Topaz but they aren't there. This is a huge workflow bottleneck as now it takes me much longer to process a large number of photos (I'm typically processing ~150-200). 4) Click 'Ok' You should now see C:Program FilesTopaz Labs LLC as the Additional Plug-Ins Folder. Photoshop Elements will be able to find all of your additional plugins within the program folders automatically. However, it is now at the point where, no matter how many times I re-do the process, it only loads a small number (sometimes 18, sometimes 25, etc) when it launches Topaz Denoise. Once you select the folder, it should show you the programs inside, but do not click them. Most of the time if it didn't work, it would work after I deleted all of the created tif files and re-tried the process. It used to be that sometimes it would load all of the tif files, sometimes it would load only a portion of them. It then launches Topaz Denoise AI and shows which files have been loaded. It first creates tif files for each raw file I have selected. Note that I have had this same problem on prior versions of both Topaz Denoise and Lightroom Classic.įrom Lightroom Classic, I use the Photo -> Edit In -> Topaz Denoise AI command. So far I haven’t found any way to get Lightroom to match the color processing between two photos, which would solve my issue.I'm wondering if anyone has had the same problem as I have on Windows with Topaz Denoise AI (v 3.4.2) run as a plug-in on Lightroom Classic (v 11.1). I’m looking for ANY way to get the DeNoise photo to look like the Lightroom imported RAW file from the camera with my chosen camera profile. This issue isn’t present if I use DeNoise as a plug-in, by exporting a copy of the Lightroom processed RAW file as a TIFF and having DeNoise, use that, but the resulting DeNoise’d file doesn’t have the detail the one processed as a RAW file does.Ī video on YouTube shows DeNoise working correctly, the DNG file is able to use the camera profiles after importing it, but I can’t get that to work at all. If you need to use DeNoise AI in External Editor. Currently, launching DeNoise AI in External Editor mode on Mac OS using certain host applicationssuch as ON1 Photo RAW or Capture Oneis not working properly. If you are on High Sierra you will need to update to Mojave or later. The file ends up looking yellowish in tint and the histogram between the RAW file and the DeNoise DNG file look very different. Mac OS minimum version has been bumped to 10.14. However, the exported DNG file, from the directly opened RAW file, is not properly recognized by Lightroom and I am unable to apply the proper camera profile to it so the colors are correct. I have the latest DeNoise AI and I love what it can do with my camera’s RAW files.
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |